Difference between revisions of "Starfleet Commander:Voting Page"

From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Please post ''<nowiki>{{Template:Support}}</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>{{Template:Neutral}}</nowiki>'', or ''<nowiki>{{Template:Oppose}}</nowiki>''.
 
Please post ''<nowiki>{{Template:Support}}</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>{{Template:Neutral}}</nowiki>'', or ''<nowiki>{{Template:Oppose}}</nowiki>''.
  
=== (3) Support ===
+
=== (4) Support ===
  
 
*{{Support}} As long as its categorized properly. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 
*{{Support}} As long as its categorized properly. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:14, 17 July 2010

Doom Beaver Vote

Please post {{Template:Support}}, {{Template:Neutral}}, or {{Template:Oppose}}.

(4) Support

  • Support.png Support As long as its categorized properly. --Phil Sutherland 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Support.png Support It is the closest thing SFC has to a religion/meme, and has become hilarious fan fiction to SFC's universe. It deserves a spot here. --Ptonjalken 13:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Support.png Support As long as it is clearly categorized as fiction. Silver Gate Squadron 14:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Support.png Support Pton said it more eloquently than I could. Long after I finish playing this game, I'll remember the doom beaver. It is worthy of memorializing as an example of the spontaneous creation of a persistent online universe. -Admiral White Haven (Poeticmotion on message board)

(0) Neutral

(1) Oppose

  • Oppose.png Oppose I vote Doom Beaver goes away. It is screwy and not worth even reading a second time and has Nothing whatsoever to do with SFC --Gary Mintz 13:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)