Difference between revisions of "Particle Cannon"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''DISADVANTAGES''' | '''DISADVANTAGES''' | ||
| − | The high crystal cost makes this effectively more expensive than the [[Pulse Cannon]] while it has less weapon power. Furthermore, even with the relatively high armor rating, the [[Athena Class]] and larger ships will get through these with ease, and the [[Ares Class]] still has [[ | + | The high crystal cost makes this effectively more expensive than the [[Pulse Cannon]] while it has less weapon power. Furthermore, even with the relatively high armor rating, the [[Athena Class]] and larger ships will get through these with ease, and the [[Ares Class]] still has [[Rapid Fire]] against it. |
==Statistics== | ==Statistics== | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 31 July 2009
Evaluation
ADVANTAGES
Very high armor rating, allowing it to withstand many hits from the smaller ships.
DISADVANTAGES
The high crystal cost makes this effectively more expensive than the Pulse Cannon while it has less weapon power. Furthermore, even with the relatively high armor rating, the Athena Class and larger ships will get through these with ease, and the Ares Class still has Rapid Fire against it.
Statistics
Cost
| ore: | 2,000 |
| crystal: | 6,000 |
| Hydrogen: | 0 |
Specifications
| hull: | 8,000 |
| armor: | 500 |
| weapons: | 150 |
Rapid Fire
| Others Versus This: |
|---|
| Ares Class x 10 |
| Zeus Class x 200 |
Requirements
| Shipyard | Level 4 |
| Particle Tech | Level 4 |
