Difference between revisions of "Starfleet Commander:Voting Page"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to searchPtonjalken (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Please post ''<nowiki>{{Template:Support}}</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>{{Template:Neutral}}</nowiki>'', or ''<nowiki>{{Template:Oppose}}</nowiki>''. | Please post ''<nowiki>{{Template:Support}}</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>{{Template:Neutral}}</nowiki>'', or ''<nowiki>{{Template:Oppose}}</nowiki>''. | ||
| − | === ( | + | === (4) Support === |
*{{Support}} As long as its categorized properly. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | *{{Support}} As long as its categorized properly. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:14, 17 July 2010
Doom Beaver Vote
Please post {{Template:Support}}, {{Template:Neutral}}, or {{Template:Oppose}}.
(4) Support
Support As long as its categorized properly. --Phil Sutherland 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)- Support It is the closest thing SFC has to a religion/meme, and has become hilarious fan fiction to SFC's universe. It deserves a spot here. --Ptonjalken 13:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support As long as it is clearly categorized as fiction. Silver Gate Squadron 14:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support Pton said it more eloquently than I could. Long after I finish playing this game, I'll remember the doom beaver. It is worthy of memorializing as an example of the spontaneous creation of a persistent online universe. -Admiral White Haven (Poeticmotion on message board)
(0) Neutral
(1) Oppose
Oppose I vote Doom Beaver goes away. It is screwy and not worth even reading a second time and has Nothing whatsoever to do with SFC --Gary Mintz 13:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
