Difference between revisions of "Starfleet Commander:Voting Page"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to searchJesus Saves (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ==Doom Beaver Vote== | + | ==Doom Beaver Vote (Open)== |
Please post ''<nowiki>{{Template:Support}}</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>{{Template:Neutral}}</nowiki>'', or ''<nowiki>{{Template:Oppose}}</nowiki>''. | Please post ''<nowiki>{{Template:Support}}</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>{{Template:Neutral}}</nowiki>'', or ''<nowiki>{{Template:Oppose}}</nowiki>''. | ||
| − | === ( | + | === (8) Support === |
*{{Support}} As long as its categorized properly. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | *{{Support}} As long as its categorized properly. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*{{Support}} Pton said it more eloquently than I could. Long after I finish playing this game, I'll remember the doom beaver. It is worthy of memorializing as an example of the spontaneous creation of a persistent online universe. -Admiral White Haven (Poeticmotion on message board) [[User:Ben Bjostad|Ben Bjostad]] 17:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | *{{Support}} Pton said it more eloquently than I could. Long after I finish playing this game, I'll remember the doom beaver. It is worthy of memorializing as an example of the spontaneous creation of a persistent online universe. -Admiral White Haven (Poeticmotion on message board) [[User:Ben Bjostad|Ben Bjostad]] 17:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
*{{Support}} I think it would be funny on SFC to entertain people and long as it's clean and organized. --[[User:Jamesa|Jamesa]] 20:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | *{{Support}} I think it would be funny on SFC to entertain people and long as it's clean and organized. --[[User:Jamesa|Jamesa]] 20:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | *{{Support}} Everything else in SFC isn't real User=Littlemouse___Vulcan High Command | ||
| + | *{{Support}} It has gone down in SFC lore already so it should get placed on the wiki. His Awesomeness should be the one to set it up tho to be fair to his creation. [[User:Paul Good|Paul Good]] 18:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | *{{Support}} It should be kept. Why get rid of something that we have enjoyed for so long? I'm not sure why this was even brought to a vote. --[[User:Matrim Cauthon|Matrim Cauthon]] | ||
===(1) Neutral === | ===(1) Neutral === | ||
*{{Neutral}} It is irrelevant to the game and grows increasingly cliche with every mention, but it's grown so popular that people would be confused given how often it is mentioned. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 20:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | *{{Neutral}} It is irrelevant to the game and grows increasingly cliche with every mention, but it's grown so popular that people would be confused given how often it is mentioned. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 20:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | ===( | + | ===(2) Oppose === |
*{{Oppose}} I vote Doom Beaver goes away. It is screwy and not worth even reading a second time and has Nothing whatsoever to do with SFC --[[User:Gary Mintz|Gary Mintz]] 13:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | *{{Oppose}} I vote Doom Beaver goes away. It is screwy and not worth even reading a second time and has Nothing whatsoever to do with SFC --[[User:Gary Mintz|Gary Mintz]] 13:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | *{{Oppose}} Doom Beaver should go away. As structured, it is totally unbelievable and unworkable even as fan fiction. If the concept was better thought out, maybe; but as it currently is, no. --[[User:Commander Noor Avi Yigdal|Commander Noor Avi Yigdal]] 04:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:03, 18 July 2010
Doom Beaver Vote (Open)
Please post {{Template:Support}}, {{Template:Neutral}}, or {{Template:Oppose}}.
(8) Support
Support As long as its categorized properly. --Phil Sutherland 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)- Support It is the closest thing SFC has to a religion/meme, and has become hilarious fan fiction to SFC's universe. It deserves a spot here. --Ptonjalken 13:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support As long as it is clearly categorized as fiction. Silver Gate Squadron 14:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support Pton said it more eloquently than I could. Long after I finish playing this game, I'll remember the doom beaver. It is worthy of memorializing as an example of the spontaneous creation of a persistent online universe. -Admiral White Haven (Poeticmotion on message board) Ben Bjostad 17:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support I think it would be funny on SFC to entertain people and long as it's clean and organized. --Jamesa 20:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support Everything else in SFC isn't real User=Littlemouse___Vulcan High Command
- Support It has gone down in SFC lore already so it should get placed on the wiki. His Awesomeness should be the one to set it up tho to be fair to his creation. Paul Good 18:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support It should be kept. Why get rid of something that we have enjoyed for so long? I'm not sure why this was even brought to a vote. --Matrim Cauthon
(1) Neutral
Neutral It is irrelevant to the game and grows increasingly cliche with every mention, but it's grown so popular that people would be confused given how often it is mentioned. Jesus Saves 20:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
(2) Oppose
Oppose I vote Doom Beaver goes away. It is screwy and not worth even reading a second time and has Nothing whatsoever to do with SFC --Gary Mintz 13:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)- Oppose Doom Beaver should go away. As structured, it is totally unbelievable and unworkable even as fan fiction. If the concept was better thought out, maybe; but as it currently is, no. --Commander Noor Avi Yigdal 04:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
