Difference between revisions of "Apollo Class Fighter"

From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
'''DISADVANTAGES'''
 
'''DISADVANTAGES'''
  
With a higher relative [[Crystal]] Cost and requiring more [[Hydrogen]] to use, the Apollo Class is not as useful for fodder as the [[Artemis Class]].  Furthermore, it does not have the combat capabilities that the [[Athena Class]] and the [[Poseidon Class]] possess.  
+
With a higher relative [[Crystal]] cost and requiring more [[Hydrogen]] to use, the Apollo Class is not as useful for fodder as the [[Artemis Class]].  Furthermore, it does not have the combat capabilities that the [[Athena Class]] and the [[Poseidon Class]] possess.
  
 
==Statistics==
 
==Statistics==

Revision as of 20:33, 30 July 2009

Apollo class.png

Evaluation

ADVANTAGES

An upgrade to the Artemis Class with better defenses and a better weapons system.

DISADVANTAGES

With a higher relative Crystal cost and requiring more Hydrogen to use, the Apollo Class is not as useful for fodder as the Artemis Class. Furthermore, it does not have the combat capabilities that the Athena Class and the Poseidon Class possess.

Statistics

Cost

ore: 6,000
crystal: 4,000
Hydrogen: 0

Specifications

hull: 1,000
armor: 25
weapons: 150
cargo capacity: 100
base speed: 10,000
hydrogen consumption: 75

Rapid Fire

This Ship Against Others: Others Versus This Ship:
Hermes Class x 5 Zeus Class x 100
Atlas Class x 3

Requirements

Shipyard Level 3
Pulse Drive Level 2
Armor Tech Level 2

See Also

ships