Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leaders"

From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by 71.206.164.48 (Talk) to last revision by 97.121.26.70)
(corrected spacing issues)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Do tear down costs factor into resources spent?
 
Do tear down costs factor into resources spent?
 
  
 
--[[User:Schumway|Schumway]] 04:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Schumway|Schumway]] 04:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 
Someone removed the details re "Overall Points", "Resources Spent", "Fleet" points and "Resources Spent"??? and there is a reference in "Defense Points" that it is the 'same as fleet'... yet someone removed the fleet details? and in "Destroyed Ships" it references "same as resources spent" which was removed by someone.
 
Someone removed the details re "Overall Points", "Resources Spent", "Fleet" points and "Resources Spent"??? and there is a reference in "Defense Points" that it is the 'same as fleet'... yet someone removed the fleet details? and in "Destroyed Ships" it references "same as resources spent" which was removed by someone.
 
Who ever removed it... want to add it back in please...
 
Who ever removed it... want to add it back in please...
 
  
 
--[[User:star feat|star feat]] 00:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 
--[[User:star feat|star feat]] 00:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
  
 
Schumway is right, please put the other points back.
 
Schumway is right, please put the other points back.
 
 
  
 
--[[User:Mayiko|Mayiko]]  22:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Mayiko|Mayiko]]  22:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 20:
 
== SHips ==
 
== SHips ==
 
That can't be right. SO i could just build a ton of probes and be first?
 
That can't be right. SO i could just build a ton of probes and be first?
 
 
  
 
I am just going to revert back to an old version that has all the different point systems described.
 
I am just going to revert back to an old version that has all the different point systems described.
 
  
 
--[Me]  13:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 
--[Me]  13:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Line 47: Line 40:
 
The rank calculation is really weird. Look at my rank and tell me whether it is right:
 
The rank calculation is really weird. Look at my rank and tell me whether it is right:
 
Resources Spent:  #18449
 
Resources Spent:  #18449
 
 
 
Fleet :          #17142
 
Fleet :          #17142
 
Research:        #7835
 
Research:        #7835
Line 54: Line 45:
 
Crew:            #16227
 
Crew:            #16227
 
Destroyed ships:  #16053
 
Destroyed ships:  #16053
 
 
Overall rank:    #18598
 
Overall rank:    #18598
  
Line 65: Line 55:
 
There are only 5 other players.  Each of them has 100 points in one category, and 1 point in the others, for 105 overall.  You have 2 points in every category, for 12 points overall.  You are second in every category, but last overall.
 
There are only 5 other players.  Each of them has 100 points in one category, and 1 point in the others, for 105 overall.  You have 2 points in every category, for 12 points overall.  You are second in every category, but last overall.
  
****************
+
* Destroyed Ships:  Here is my question.  In group attacks, does anyone know how the ship kills get allocated?  Are they tied to the actual kills tallied by the calculator for each ship, and assigned accordingly?  Are they divided evenly?  Or by some proportionality rule? -- BowMtnSpirit
Destroyed Ships:  Here is my question.  In group attacks, does anyone know how the ship kills get allocated?  Are they tied to the actual kills tallied by the calculator for each ship, and assigned accordingly?  Are they divided evenly?  Or by some proportionality rule?
 
 
 
-- BowMtnSpirit
 
 
 
****************
 

Revision as of 15:50, 8 July 2010

--Tony 20:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

There are several areas this page is not clear enough about.

  • When calculating resource points, does the total include resources spent on research?
  • When calculating overall points is it a simple sum of the sub-sections or are they weighted in any way?

Do tear down costs factor into resources spent?

--Schumway 04:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Someone removed the details re "Overall Points", "Resources Spent", "Fleet" points and "Resources Spent"??? and there is a reference in "Defense Points" that it is the 'same as fleet'... yet someone removed the fleet details? and in "Destroyed Ships" it references "same as resources spent" which was removed by someone. Who ever removed it... want to add it back in please...

--star feat 00:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Schumway is right, please put the other points back.

--Mayiko 22:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

SHips

That can't be right. SO i could just build a ton of probes and be first?

I am just going to revert back to an old version that has all the different point systems described.

--[Me] 13:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

This page claims that the Overall is just a sum of the others, but that is not true. Here are my stats: Overall: 168492 Resources Spent: 121037 Fleet: 2207 Research: 135 Defense: 344 Crew: 47 Destroyed Ships: 53578

The sum of all of the others is 177348, not 168492 as the overall says. The game and wiki do not match.

--- pheonixdancer, Feb. 10, 2010

The rank calculation is really weird. Look at my rank and tell me whether it is right: Resources Spent: #18449 Fleet : #17142 Research: #7835 Defense: #16352 Crew: #16227 Destroyed ships: #16053 Overall rank: #18598

Making sense? All my ranks in each category are better than my overall rank.

Response:

It is entirely possible for your rankings in each category to be better than your overall rank, based on the distribution of points. Consider this simplified and extreme case:

There are only 5 other players. Each of them has 100 points in one category, and 1 point in the others, for 105 overall. You have 2 points in every category, for 12 points overall. You are second in every category, but last overall.

  • Destroyed Ships: Here is my question. In group attacks, does anyone know how the ship kills get allocated? Are they tied to the actual kills tallied by the calculator for each ship, and assigned accordingly? Are they divided evenly? Or by some proportionality rule? -- BowMtnSpirit