Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bashing"

From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by 212.235.107.88 (Talk) to last revision by Jamesa)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Good question. I would assume 24 hours after the first attack but I may be wrong. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 19:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 
Good question. I would assume 24 hours after the first attack but I may be wrong. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 19:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 
== forex expert advisors ==
 
 
forex robot tested and reviewed by expert traders Discover just what succeeds coupled with what doesnt with the help of forex trading specialized reports and even research into the most up to date automated programs [URL=http://www.forexrobot.tv - forexrobot.tv[/URL - .
 
 
We find the truth about foreign exchange automated trading programs and show the unsuspicious purchaser everything that actually matter examine fx trading tested and reviewed by experts View just what exactly gets results and also everything that does not by means of foreign currency trading [URL=http://www.forexrobot.tv - forex trading system[/URL -
 

Revision as of 03:56, 29 September 2010

Query: Is an intercepted espionage attempt an "attack" for the purposes of bashing? The term the software uses DOES refer to the espionage as an "attack".

I highly doubt it. The person sending the probe sent it for the purpose of probing, not attacking. Jesus Saves 03:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Does the 24 hour window start on the 6th attack or from the 1st attack after 6th has hit? Potentially you could attack someone 5 times, then 23 hours attack once more and trigger the bashing rule. In theory if the time started from the last attack, a person would have only been attacked once in 24 hours by the time the clock expired.

Good question. I would assume 24 hours after the first attack but I may be wrong. Jesus Saves 19:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)