Difference between revisions of "Starfleet Commander:Voting Page"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Doom Beaver Vote== | ==Doom Beaver Vote== | ||
Please post ''<nowiki>{{Template:Support}}</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>{{Template:Neutral}}</nowiki>'', or ''<nowiki>{{Template:Oppose}}</nowiki>''. | Please post ''<nowiki>{{Template:Support}}</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>{{Template:Neutral}}</nowiki>'', or ''<nowiki>{{Template:Oppose}}</nowiki>''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === (2) Support === | ||
*{{Support}} As long as its categorized properly. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | *{{Support}} As long as its categorized properly. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | *{{Support}} It is the closest thing SFC has to a religion/meme, and has become hilarious fan fiction to SFC's universe. It deserves a spot here. --[[User:Ptonjalken|Ptonjalken]] 13:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===(0) Neutral === | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===(1) Oppose === | ||
*{{Oppose}} I vote Doom Beaver goes away. It is screwy and not worth even reading a second time and has Nothing whatsoever to do with SFC --[[User:Gary Mintz|Gary Mintz]] 13:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | *{{Oppose}} I vote Doom Beaver goes away. It is screwy and not worth even reading a second time and has Nothing whatsoever to do with SFC --[[User:Gary Mintz|Gary Mintz]] 13:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 13:53, 17 July 2010
Doom Beaver Vote
Please post {{Template:Support}}, {{Template:Neutral}}, or {{Template:Oppose}}.
(2) Support
Support As long as its categorized properly. --Phil Sutherland 13:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)- Support It is the closest thing SFC has to a religion/meme, and has become hilarious fan fiction to SFC's universe. It deserves a spot here. --Ptonjalken 13:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
(0) Neutral
(1) Oppose
Oppose I vote Doom Beaver goes away. It is screwy and not worth even reading a second time and has Nothing whatsoever to do with SFC --Gary Mintz 13:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
