|
|
| (17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Readers Beware'''
| + | Removed Vandalism Trash |
| − | This list of links below me probably lead to nothing good, but since it's out of the main page I won't touch it.
| |
| | | | |
| − | kC6i1h <a href="http://wqygerckerts.com/">wqygerckerts</a>, [url=http://sodwcsklmihm.com/]sodwcsklmihm[/url], [link=http://nnfswizukabo.com/]nnfswizukabo[/link], http://ewvqxkovcqdc.com/
| + | ==Cost== |
| | + | Other pages (Fields, Building, etc) indicate that the cost for terraforming depends on the number of fields already on the planet, so that terraforming a small planet would be fairly inexpensive, but terraforming a larger planet would be more expensive. Someone should verify which information is correct. |
| | | | |
| − | == How many? == | + | ==Lottery== |
| − | | + | I won a terraform in the Lottery, but cannot seem to use it. I know that planets with more than 320 fields cannot be colonized, but is there an upper limit to how many fields you can add to a planet by terraforming? |
| − | How many fields will it add?
| |
| − | I believe it is 5 every time. | |
| − | | |
| − | Can you increase the temperature of the planet?
| |
| − | I don't think so.
| |
| − | | |
| − | I tried terraforming to see what it would do and for 32k in credits approximate on a planet of size 127 or so it would raise the fields by 5 pts. and nothing else was affected from initial plans. It waited for approval which I did not go ahead with.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Seems like robbery to me ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | A planet with 170ish fields might be a good candidate, but 50k+ in credits for five additional fields is crazy overpriced. I wouldn't worry about it unbalancing the game too much; people with credits will still find it more economical to re-colonize. I suspect this is an endgame ability to be used when, say, your home planet needs just a few more fields to squeeze in the foundry or something.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Blue Frog made this comment about it:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :''"I think you and everyone else complaining about the large cost of upgrading an already huge planet are missing the point. You'll never fill a 306 field planet, or even a 206, so why would you terraform it? If we based the price such that it were affordable for a 300 field planet, which nobody would ever terraform, it would be way too cheap for a 150 field planet which will be terraformed frequently.''
| |
| − | | |
| − | :''We're just now getting to the point where people are filling their home worlds (163 fields) after the game has been live for exactly 4 months. And since buildings cost exponentially more with each level, you'd have to play for probably at least a year just to fill a 185 slot (assuming you're not intentionally doing stuff to overbuild like Factory lvl 10).''
| |
| − | | |
| − | :''The price for upgrading your home world is about 53k credits. That's been fairly common already."''
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Max ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Can this increase a planet's size beyond 320? I heard that was the max base size.
| |
| − | :Why would you want to? See the above comments by BFG. --[[User:Rob|Rob]] 20:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | Because I'm rich and bored. The question is not why should I do it, but whether it can be done. The information is to keep the wiki thorough.
| |
| − | :I think that would be a question to ask on the message boards. --[[User:Rob|Rob]] 15:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
Removed Vandalism Trash
Cost
Other pages (Fields, Building, etc) indicate that the cost for terraforming depends on the number of fields already on the planet, so that terraforming a small planet would be fairly inexpensive, but terraforming a larger planet would be more expensive. Someone should verify which information is correct.
Lottery
I won a terraform in the Lottery, but cannot seem to use it. I know that planets with more than 320 fields cannot be colonized, but is there an upper limit to how many fields you can add to a planet by terraforming?
