Difference between revisions of "Talk:Terraform"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search (3twi3a <a href="http://emoihgicghlu.com/">emoihgicghlu</a>, [url=http://wswyisiisllb.com/]wswyisiisllb[/url], [link=http://unywabubddlk.com/]unywabubddlk[/link], http://cxxwfyescphg.com/) |
(Had some questions to ask.) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Removed Vandalism Trash | |
| − | + | ==Cost== | |
| + | Other pages (Fields, Building, etc) indicate that the cost for terraforming depends on the number of fields already on the planet, so that terraforming a small planet would be fairly inexpensive, but terraforming a larger planet would be more expensive. Someone should verify which information is correct. | ||
| − | == | + | ==Lottery== |
| − | + | I won a terraform in the Lottery, but cannot seem to use it. I know that planets with more than 320 fields cannot be colonized, but is there an upper limit to how many fields you can add to a planet by terraforming? | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 08:17, 27 January 2016
Removed Vandalism Trash
Cost
Other pages (Fields, Building, etc) indicate that the cost for terraforming depends on the number of fields already on the planet, so that terraforming a small planet would be fairly inexpensive, but terraforming a larger planet would be more expensive. Someone should verify which information is correct.
Lottery
I won a terraform in the Lottery, but cannot seem to use it. I know that planets with more than 320 fields cannot be colonized, but is there an upper limit to how many fields you can add to a planet by terraforming?
