Difference between revisions of "Talk:Missions"

From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
It might be an idea to do an 'adjusted resources per second' table, using the standard trading ratios.
 
It might be an idea to do an 'adjusted resources per second' table, using the standard trading ratios.
 +
 +
:As I commented above, these tables really don't belong here at all. This page is not about how to min/max powergame your way through Starfleet Commander. It is an informational page about the available missions and their rewards. These tables should be moved to a separate user's strategy guide page. They should also be formatted in a style consistent with the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Rob|Rob]] 15:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:11, 24 November 2009

I don't think the "Resources Per Second" tables really belong on this page. This page is an informational list of the missions, their requirements, and the resources gained. A "resources per second" would be more appropriate to some kind of strategy page or guide. It should probably be moved to such a page, which could be linked in a "See Also" section at the bottom of the page. --Rob 20:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Agreed, though I will say that I appreciate the addition. Mstefaniak 20:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Page formatting

The tables on this page are too wide. They should be narrowed so that users don't have to pan the window to see all columns. __Meco 12:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

New table?

It might be an idea to do an 'adjusted resources per second' table, using the standard trading ratios.

As I commented above, these tables really don't belong here at all. This page is not about how to min/max powergame your way through Starfleet Commander. It is an informational page about the available missions and their rewards. These tables should be moved to a separate user's strategy guide page. They should also be formatted in a style consistent with the rest of the wiki. --Rob 15:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)