Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bashing"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (Removed Trash Vandalism) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Does the 24 hour window start on the 6th attack or from the 1st attack after 6th has hit? Potentially you could attack someone 5 times, then 23 hours attack once more and trigger the bashing rule. In theory if the time started from the last attack, a person would have only been attacked once in 24 hours by the time the clock expired. | Does the 24 hour window start on the 6th attack or from the 1st attack after 6th has hit? Potentially you could attack someone 5 times, then 23 hours attack once more and trigger the bashing rule. In theory if the time started from the last attack, a person would have only been attacked once in 24 hours by the time the clock expired. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 21:59, 1 September 2010
Query: Is an intercepted espionage attempt an "attack" for the purposes of bashing? The term the software uses DOES refer to the espionage as an "attack".
I highly doubt it. The person sending the probe sent it for the purpose of probing, not attacking. Jesus Saves 03:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Does the 24 hour window start on the 6th attack or from the 1st attack after 6th has hit? Potentially you could attack someone 5 times, then 23 hours attack once more and trigger the bashing rule. In theory if the time started from the last attack, a person would have only been attacked once in 24 hours by the time the clock expired.
