|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Query: Is an intercepted espionage attempt an "attack" for the purposes of bashing? The term the software uses DOES refer to the espionage as an "attack".
| + | PDFbhP <a href="http://elrfoedvxssz.com/">elrfoedvxssz</a>, [url=http://modhpegyspbh.com/]modhpegyspbh[/url], [link=http://uenoxcoyqjbf.com/]uenoxcoyqjbf[/link], http://yfgzvrcqulsb.com/ |
| − | | |
| − | I highly doubt it. The person sending the probe sent it for the purpose of probing, not attacking. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 03:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Does the 24 hour window start on the 6th attack or from the 1st attack after 6th has hit? Potentially you could attack someone 5 times, then 23 hours attack once more and trigger the bashing rule. In theory if the time started from the last attack, a person would have only been attacked once in 24 hours by the time the clock expired.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Good question. I would assume 24 hours after the first attack but I may be wrong. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 19:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | - I can confirm that an intercepted espionage mission, in which all probes are killed, does NOT count. - [[User:Silver Gate Squadron|Silver Gate Squadron]] 03:57, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Link is down? ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thanks for sharing the link, but unfortunately it seems to be offline... Does anybody have a mirror or another source? Please answer to my message if you do!
| |
| − | | |
| − | I would appreciate if someone here at forum.playstarfleet.com could repost it.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thanks,
| |
| − | John
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Link is down? ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thanks for sharing this link, but argg it seems to be offline... Does anybody have a mirror or another source? Please answer to my message if you do!
| |
| − | | |
| − | I would appreciate if someone here at forum.playstarfleet.com could repost it.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thanks,
| |
| − | Alex
| |
Revision as of 01:44, 22 November 2010
