Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bashing"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to searchJesus Saves (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I highly doubt it. The person sending the probe sent it for the purpose of probing, not attacking. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 03:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | I highly doubt it. The person sending the probe sent it for the purpose of probing, not attacking. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 03:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does the 24 hour window start on the 6th attack or from the 1st attack after 6th has hit? Potentially you could attack someone 5 times, then 23 hours attack once more and trigger the bashing rule. In theory if the time started from the last attack, a person would have only been attacked once in 24 hours by the time the clock expired. | ||
Revision as of 17:01, 14 July 2010
Query: Is an intercepted espionage attempt an "attack" for the purposes of bashing? The term the software uses DOES refer to the espionage as an "attack".
I highly doubt it. The person sending the probe sent it for the purpose of probing, not attacking. Jesus Saves 03:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Does the 24 hour window start on the 6th attack or from the 1st attack after 6th has hit? Potentially you could attack someone 5 times, then 23 hours attack once more and trigger the bashing rule. In theory if the time started from the last attack, a person would have only been attacked once in 24 hours by the time the clock expired.
