|
|
| (53 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | =Admin Descussions=
| + | {{Archived}} |
| − | Admin Descussions and updates are written here.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Vandalism from bots==
| |
| − | There seems to be quite a bit of vandalism latley from spam bots.
| |
| − | Silver Gate Squadron mentioned an idea about semi protecting every single page.
| |
| − | So what are the thoughts on this?
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − | | |
| − | *I'd be OK with it. As I was told, Laggynate wants to be alerted whenever a page is locked, so I assume this would constitute a massive locking spree. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 13:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | *Well all 3 of us and maybe even laggynate would have to spend some time protecting them. I will also talk to Matt since an operation of this size needs his approval. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ''* As I understand it, "protect" and "lock" are two different things. I beleive "protected" pages can be edited by anyone as long as they are a registered user (not just a random IP address) and I was suggesting that. Since most of the vandalism seems to be coming from unregistered IP addresses. Not a full lockdown (as has been done on a few pages, like how the Oracle page used to have the wrong info in the grid but nobody could change it). [[User:Silver Gate Squadron|Silver Gate Squadron]] 04:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)''
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Ah, OK. I like that idea. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 13:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Ya thats what I meant I just use the terms semi-lock (registered users) and fully-lock(Admins only)
| |
| − | Il email Matt on Monday morning asking him what he thinks. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 14:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '' - I've protected the [[Artemis Class Fighter]] page, after it was reverted from vandalism damage for the third time in eight hours. [[User:Silver Gate Squadron|Silver Gate Squadron]] 15:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC) ''
| |
| − | '' - P.S. Also protected [[Charon Class Transport]] for the same reason. [[User:Silver Gate Squadron|Silver Gate Squadron]] 17:26, 12 July 2010 (UTC) ''
| |
| − | | |
| − | == New Ship Info ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Recently approved by Matt.
| |
| − | *<S>'''Hephaestus Class Attack Platform'''
| |
| − | *Length: 80km
| |
| − | *Width: 30km
| |
| − | *Height\Depth: 25km
| |
| − | *Crew: 800,000
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''Hermes Class Probe'''
| |
| − | *Length: 2m
| |
| − | *Width: 1.2m
| |
| − | *Height: 1.2m
| |
| − | *Crew: 0
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''Zeus Class'''
| |
| − | *Diameter: 15,000m
| |
| − | *Height\Depth 17,000m
| |
| − | *Crew: 50,000</s>
| |
| − | | |
| − | *<s>'''Charon Class Transport'''
| |
| − | *Length: 40m
| |
| − | *Width: 22m
| |
| − | *Height\Depth: 22m
| |
| − | *Crew: 4
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''Helios Class Solar Satellite'''
| |
| − | *Length: 15m
| |
| − | *Width: 15m
| |
| − | *Height/Depth: 5m
| |
| − | *Crew: 0
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''Ares Class Bomber'''
| |
| − | *Length: 400m
| |
| − | *Width: 300m
| |
| − | *Height\Depth: 250m
| |
| − | *Crew: 200</s>
| |
| − | | |
| − | *<S>'''Gaia Class Colony Ship'''
| |
| − | *Diameter: 10,000m
| |
| − | *Height\Depth: 4000m
| |
| − | *Crew: 200
| |
| − | *Passengers: 2000
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''Dionysus Class Recycler'''
| |
| − | *Length: 55m
| |
| − | *Width: 40m
| |
| − | *Height/Depth: 15m
| |
| − | *Crew: 40</s>
| |
| − | | |
| − | *<S>'''Hercules Class Cargo'''
| |
| − | *Length: 75m
| |
| − | *Width: 37m
| |
| − | *Height\Depth: 18m
| |
| − | *Crew: 60
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''Atlas Class Cargo'''
| |
| − | *Length: 55m
| |
| − | *Width: 23m
| |
| − | *Height\Depth: 7m
| |
| − | *Crew: 25</S>
| |
| − | | |
| − | *<s>'''Apollo Class Fighter'''
| |
| − | *Length: 19m
| |
| − | *Width: 8m
| |
| − | *Height/Depth: 1.5m
| |
| − | *Crew: 1
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''Artemis Class Fighter'''
| |
| − | *Length: 7m
| |
| − | *Width: 15m
| |
| − | *Height/Depth: 2m
| |
| − | *Crew: 1
| |
| − | | |
| − | *'''Poisidon Class Cruiser'''
| |
| − | *Length: 150m
| |
| − | *Width: 50m
| |
| − | *Height/Depth: 30m
| |
| − | *Crew: 70</s>
| |
| − | | |
| − | *<s>'''Athena Class Battleship'''
| |
| − | *Length: 500m
| |
| − | *Width: 300m
| |
| − | *Height/Depth: 140m
| |
| − | *Crew: 600</s>
| |
| − | | |
| − | *<s>'''Hades Class Battleship'''
| |
| − | *Length: 800m
| |
| − | *Width: 240m
| |
| − | *Height/Depth: 135m
| |
| − | *Crew: 2000</s>
| |
| − | | |
| − | *<s>'''Prometheus Class Destroyer'''
| |
| − | *Length: 1800m
| |
| − | *Width: 600m
| |
| − | *Height/Depth: 450m
| |
| − | *Crew: 5000</s>
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Trying to figure out the best way to put it in the wiki --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 00:05, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Lololol they actually made this information? Nice. But how is it going to be used? [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 01:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | *There that should make it more readable. Im trying to figure out a good type of chart to stick in every page. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | *Check out the [[Athena Class Battleship]] I put in a chart with it in it. Does it look ok?
| |
| − | --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 14:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | * That looks great. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 13:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | ==Doom Beaver==
| |
| − | The Doom Beaver page was revitalized. Do we keep it or no? I really like it but it's not technically part of the game, more like folklore... [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 19:20, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | I say we put it up to vote. Im going to create a vote page for the wiki. My suggestion is to create a folklore section of the wiki.
| |
| − | --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 20:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I have create the vote page [[Editing Starfleet Commander:Voting Page|here]]
| |
| − | please all vote using same templates as Request for admin status. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 20:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Spam Bots ==
| |
| − | Recently there have been lots of vandalism by spam bots. Im not sure what we can do to stop this or at least minimize it.
| |
| − | Any ideas?--[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 11:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | *Block faster :D [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 14:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | *I don't bother to block them since ive never seen a spam bot twice from the same IP address --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 20:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | == Really Funny ==
| |
| − | Every one read this [[User:Jamesa|page]].
| |
| − | Im definitively not the head of the wiki. Admin or Bureaucrat status is not a rank, its a privilege and it does not carry any weight in discussions. Matt is the head of the wiki, if anyone is. I just notified the alliance leader that one of his members was being a huge pain on the wiki and breaking his stated alliance rules. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 20:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
| |
