Difference between revisions of "Talk:Teardown"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search1833381529 (talk | contribs) (contents copied to another page.) |
1833381529 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --[[User:Narmuriel|Narmuriel]] | :I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --[[User:Narmuriel|Narmuriel]] | ||
| − | I | + | I'm linking this page to Buildings > Functions. [User:Mikey Boots|Mikey Boots]] |
Revision as of 00:45, 10 January 2010
Lame - have to spend resources to tear something down.... but you can't recycle the building.... anyone see something odd about that?
- I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --Narmuriel
I'm linking this page to Buildings > Functions. [User:Mikey Boots|Mikey Boots]]
