Difference between revisions of "Talk:Teardown"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search1833381529 (talk | contribs) (contents copied to another page.) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --[[User:Narmuriel|Narmuriel]] | :I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --[[User:Narmuriel|Narmuriel]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am copying and moving the contents of Teardown to Buildings > Functions. Why? Because I'm not really sure how to move it. | ||
Revision as of 00:43, 10 January 2010
Lame - have to spend resources to tear something down.... but you can't recycle the building.... anyone see something odd about that?
- I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --Narmuriel
I am copying and moving the contents of Teardown to Buildings > Functions. Why? Because I'm not really sure how to move it.
