Difference between revisions of "Talk:Teardown"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with 'Lame - have to spend resources to tear something down.... but you can't recycle the building.... anyone see something odd about that?') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Lame - have to spend resources to tear something down.... but you can't recycle the building.... anyone see something odd about that? | Lame - have to spend resources to tear something down.... but you can't recycle the building.... anyone see something odd about that? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --[[User:Narmuriel|Narmuriel]] | ||
Revision as of 19:51, 6 November 2009
Lame - have to spend resources to tear something down.... but you can't recycle the building.... anyone see something odd about that?
- I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --Narmuriel
