|
|
(81 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | =Admin Descussions=
| + | {{Archived}} |
− | Admin Descussions and updates are written here.
| |
− | | |
− | ==Vandalism from bots==
| |
− | There seems to be quite a bit of vandalism latley from spam bots.
| |
− | Silver Gate Squadron mentioned an idea about semi protecting every single page.
| |
− | So what are the thoughts on this?
| |
− | ----
| |
− | | |
− | *I'd be OK with it. As I was told, Laggynate wants to be alerted whenever a page is locked, so I assume this would constitute a massive locking spree. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 13:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
− | *Well all 3 of us and maybe even laggynate would have to spend some time protecting them. I will also talk to Matt since an operation of this size needs his approval. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 13:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | ''* As I understand it, "protect" and "lock" are two different things. I beleive "protected" pages can be edited by anyone as long as they are a registered user (not just a random IP address) and I was suggesting that. Since most of the vandalism seems to be coming from unregistered IP addresses. Not a full lockdown (as has been done on a few pages, like how the Oracle page used to have the wrong info in the grid but nobody could change it). [[User:Silver Gate Squadron|Silver Gate Squadron]] 04:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)''
| |
− | | |
− | *Ah, OK. I like that idea. [[User:Jesus Saves|Jesus Saves]] 13:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | *Ya thats what I meant I just use the terms semi-lock (registered users) and fully-lock(Admins only)
| |
− | Il email Matt on Monday morning asking him what he thinks. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 14:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
| |