Difference between revisions of "Talk:Teardown"
From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
In real life, very little is recoverable from a building that is torn down. In most cases, the cost of tearing down a building will greatly exceed any recovered costs in terms of recycled materials. Seems fair enough the way it is set up. | In real life, very little is recoverable from a building that is torn down. In most cases, the cost of tearing down a building will greatly exceed any recovered costs in terms of recycled materials. Seems fair enough the way it is set up. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | _______________________________________ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Question - if im tearing down a buildung with cost 6 mio, will i get 6k points back in the leaders? | ||
Latest revision as of 09:41, 12 January 2011
Lame - have to spend resources to tear something down.... but you can't recycle the building.... anyone see something odd about that?
- I partially agree. I dont think you should be able to recycle the full amount, and I do think you should spend resources to teardown. After all, in the real world, it does cost money, time, equipment, and manpower to demolish something. I am thinking you should get like 25% of the resources back. --Narmuriel
I'm linking this page to Buildings > Functions. - mikey boots.
Does this work on the homeworld?
In real life, very little is recoverable from a building that is torn down. In most cases, the cost of tearing down a building will greatly exceed any recovered costs in terms of recycled materials. Seems fair enough the way it is set up.
_______________________________________
Question - if im tearing down a buildung with cost 6 mio, will i get 6k points back in the leaders?
