Difference between revisions of "Talk:Royal Commonwealth of Planets"

From Starfleet Commander
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with 'This has been nominated for deletion and the reason is "reason"? This page should be left alone by the wiki editors unless you are editing for spelling or grammar. Content shou…')
 
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This has been nominated for deletion and the reason is "reason"?  This page should be left alone by the wiki editors unless you are editing for spelling or grammar.  Content should be left to the Alliance.  For some reason, Phil Sutherland has taken a special interest in our Alliance page - and since he recently pressed (and failed) to have our Alliance merge with the one he leads, I consider this to be a conflict of interest.  Phil, I politely asked you to leave the RCP page alone.  Knock it off.
 
This has been nominated for deletion and the reason is "reason"?  This page should be left alone by the wiki editors unless you are editing for spelling or grammar.  Content should be left to the Alliance.  For some reason, Phil Sutherland has taken a special interest in our Alliance page - and since he recently pressed (and failed) to have our Alliance merge with the one he leads, I consider this to be a conflict of interest.  Phil, I politely asked you to leave the RCP page alone.  Knock it off.
 +
 +
Hello there, Phil has promised not to touch the RCP Page due to in game conflicts.
 +
You will have to talk to the other me or another admin about this. I personally put the candidate for deletion tag on it because of numerous spelling and grammar errors and not categorized properly. It will be removed when Page is fixed. It is not the only page with this tag. --[[User:Shane Whaleman|Shane Whaleman]] 19:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
I reviewed the edits.  Shane added the deletion tag after all spelling errors were corrected and the article was cut to the bare minimum.  Phil has since removed the deletion tag.  Phil needs to leave the page alone and request another admin edit to add or remove tags as necessary. {{unsigned|Grummm| at {{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}.}}
 +
 +
I have been avoiding this page as much as possible but the Stub tag remains for the time being.
 +
But will at the current rate of improvement will be removed with in a few days. --[[User:Phil Sutherland|Phil Sutherland]] 21:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:23, 27 June 2010

This has been nominated for deletion and the reason is "reason"? This page should be left alone by the wiki editors unless you are editing for spelling or grammar. Content should be left to the Alliance. For some reason, Phil Sutherland has taken a special interest in our Alliance page - and since he recently pressed (and failed) to have our Alliance merge with the one he leads, I consider this to be a conflict of interest. Phil, I politely asked you to leave the RCP page alone. Knock it off.

Hello there, Phil has promised not to touch the RCP Page due to in game conflicts. You will have to talk to the other me or another admin about this. I personally put the candidate for deletion tag on it because of numerous spelling and grammar errors and not categorized properly. It will be removed when Page is fixed. It is not the only page with this tag. --Shane Whaleman 19:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

I reviewed the edits. Shane added the deletion tag after all spelling errors were corrected and the article was cut to the bare minimum. Phil has since removed the deletion tag. Phil needs to leave the page alone and request another admin edit to add or remove tags as necessary. —The preceding unsigned comment was made by Grummm (talkcontribs) at 03:06, 2 June 2024..

I have been avoiding this page as much as possible but the Stub tag remains for the time being. But will at the current rate of improvement will be removed with in a few days. --Phil Sutherland 21:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)