|
|
| (28 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Cheating? ==
| + | Removed Vandalism Trash |
| | | | |
| − | If terraforming is in fact adding additional fields to a planet, then this is going to alienate a lot of people. It seems that Blue Frog Gaming is ok with cheating as long as they are making money from it. I do not buy stuff (or take surveys or whatever) to earn credits and do not intend to. As such I will never be taking part in terraforming.
| + | ==Cost== |
| | + | Other pages (Fields, Building, etc) indicate that the cost for terraforming depends on the number of fields already on the planet, so that terraforming a small planet would be fairly inexpensive, but terraforming a larger planet would be more expensive. Someone should verify which information is correct. |
| | | | |
| − | --[[User:500070673|500070673]] 18:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
| + | ==Lottery== |
| − | | + | I won a terraform in the Lottery, but cannot seem to use it. I know that planets with more than 320 fields cannot be colonized, but is there an upper limit to how many fields you can add to a planet by terraforming? |
| − | I would suggest contacting Blue Frog Gaming to express your displeasure regarding this. From the Terms of Use: "If you have any questions, comments or complaints regarding this Agreement or the Game, feel free to contact us at support@bluefroggaming.com[mailto:support@bluefroggaming.com]." You can also click on the Help link at left and use the contact form there.
| |
| − | | |
| − | --[[User:500070673|500070673]] 18:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Without Blue Frog Gaming, you wouldn't have a game to play so stop your moaning you tight arse.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == How many? == | |
| − | | |
| − | How many fields will it add?
| |
| − | I believe it is 5 every time. | |
| − | | |
| − | Can you increase the temperature of the planet?
| |
| − | I don't think so.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Seems like robbery to me ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | A planet with 170ish fields might be a good candidate, but 50k+ in credits for five additional fields is crazy overpriced. I wouldn't worry about it unbalancing the game too much; people with credits will still find it more economical to re-colonize. I suspect this is an endgame ability to be used when, say, your home planet needs just a few more fields to squeeze in the foundry or something.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Blue Frog made this comment about it:
| |
| − | | |
| − | I think you and everyone else complaining about the large cost of upgrading an already huge planet are missing the point. You'll never fill a 306 field planet, or even a 206, so why would you terraform it? If we based the price such that it were affordable for a 300 field planet, which nobody would ever terraform, it would be way too cheap for a 150 field planet which will be terraformed frequently.
| |
| − | | |
| − | We're just now getting to the point where people are filling their home worlds (163 fields) after the game has been live for exactly 4 months. And since buildings cost exponentially more with each level, you'd have to play for probably at least a year just to fill a 185 slot (assuming you're not intentionally doing stuff to overbuild like Factory lvl 10).
| |
| − | | |
| − | The price for upgrading your home world is about 53k credits. That's been fairly common already.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Max ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Can this increase a planet's size beyond 320? I heard that was the max base size.
| |
Removed Vandalism Trash
Cost
Other pages (Fields, Building, etc) indicate that the cost for terraforming depends on the number of fields already on the planet, so that terraforming a small planet would be fairly inexpensive, but terraforming a larger planet would be more expensive. Someone should verify which information is correct.
Lottery
I won a terraform in the Lottery, but cannot seem to use it. I know that planets with more than 320 fields cannot be colonized, but is there an upper limit to how many fields you can add to a planet by terraforming?
